Colonial literature: unity in the diversity of its writings The "Black Hole" in the Ecuadorian Literary Field

Main Article Content

Alexandra Pancho Gamboa

Abstract

This study proposes that the limited knowledge of colonial-era literature has functioned within the Ecuadorian literary field much like a black hole in cosmic space. Therefore, the aim is to examine why, in the context of the globalized 21st century, literary archaeology—dedicated to uncovering the country’s largely unknown colonial writings—remains a relevant and necessary pursuit. The inquiry begins with an analysis of the cultural and literary conditions of the colonial period, as well as the characteristics of contemporary literature. The black hole, as a metaphor for understanding the impact that disinterest in colonial literature has had up to the present, also allows us to sense the need to reconsider the guidelines for its study from a perspective that embraces the literary and cultural diversity of these "forgotten" texts. Against this backdrop, the concept of literary archaeology emerges as a research field designed to offer new conceptual and methodological tools. These tools facilitate a reflective reassessment of the interactions among agents in the Ecuadorian literary field, and invigorate cultural memory. By continuing to interweave texts from different periods, spaces, and genres, the obscured regions of literary black holes become light, challenging the perception of colonial literature as a bygone and disconnected past, and instead recognizing its enduring relevance to the present.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Artículos

How to Cite

Pancho Gamboa, A. (2025). Colonial literature: unity in the diversity of its writings: The "Black Hole" in the Ecuadorian Literary Field. Ecuadorian Journal of Philosophical-Theological Sciences, 2(3), 68-80. https://doi.org/10.26807/recifit.v2n3.42

References

Baumgarten, A. (2009/ 1750 y 1758). Ästhetik, Hamburg: Meiner F. Verlag. Band 1 und 2.

Bourdieu, P. (2011/1992). Las reglas del arte. Génesis y estructura del campo literario, traducción de Thomas Kauf, Barcelona: Anagrama.

Cornejo, A. (1994). Escribir en el aire. Ensayo sobre la heterogeneidad socio-cultural en las literaturas andinas, Lima-Berkeley: CELAP.

Díaz-Caneja, T. y Lanfranco, M. (1987). La literatura en el período. En Ernesto Albán y Juan Valdano (Coords.) (1987). Literatura de la Colonia (1700-1767 /1767-1830), vol. II., pp. 35-54, Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar y Corporación Editora Nacional.

Echevarría, I. (2007). Desvíos. Un recorrido crítico por la reciente narrativa latinoamericana, Santiago de Chile: Universidad Diego Portales.

Finkielkraut, A. (2023). La Posliteratura, Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Gallego Cuiñas, A. (2014). El valor del objeto literario, Ínsula, 814, 2-5.

https://www.academia.edu/36011064/El_valor_del_objeto_literario

Herrnstein Smith, B. (1991): Contingencies of Value. Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory, Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Lotman, J. (1989/1972). Die Struktur literarischer Texte, Übersetzt von Rolf- Dietrich Keil, München: Wilhelm Fink.

Mora, V. (2014). Globalización y literatura hispánicas: de lo posnacional a la novela glocal. Pasavento. Revista de Estudios Hispánicos, 2(2), 319-343.

Pancho Gamboa, A. (2024). Los territorios literarios de la globalización. La narrativa hispanoamericana diaspórica (1990-2016). (Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Tübingen).

https://ub01.uni-tuebingen.de/xmlui/handle/10900/154909

Perus, F. (2009). Leer no es consumir. La literatura latinoamericana ante la globalización. Revista de crítica literaria latinoamericana, 35(69), 11-31.

Pratt, M.L. (2010). Ojos imperiales. Literatura de viajes y transculturación, traducción de Ofelia Castillo, México: FCE.

Schmidt-Welle, F. (ed.) (2003): Ficciones y silencios fundacionales.Literaturas y culturas poscoloniales en América Latina (siglo XIX). Madrid, Frankfurt am Main: Iberoamericana Vervuert.

Seydel, U. (2014). La constitución de la memoria cultural. Acta Poética, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.19130/iifl.ap.2014.2.451

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.