The humanities as a "tactic". Reflections through Michel de Certeau
Main Article Content
Abstract
This essay seeks to offer a critical reflection on the place and power of the humanities in the contemporary world, based on the approaches of Michel de Certeau. Faced with a landscape dominated by technocracy, the management of useful knowledge, and the logic of productivity, it is proposed that the humanities can be understood as a “tactic” in the Certeauian sense: a minor, mobile, and situated practice that operates within the devices of power without being entirely subject to them. Based on certain Certoian ideas, this essay argues that humanistic knowledge practices—in their forms of reading, writing, listening, and interpretation—embody alternative modes of explanation, problematization, and positioning that seek to transcend the dominant ideas about what is “valuable” and “necessary” for a society. Rather than defending an essence of the humanities, this text advocates thinking of them as a “way of doing”: as an art of deviation, of drifting and of rewriting the given.
Downloads
Article Details
Data Availability Statement
The research data have not been made available. The article is of a reflective nature.
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Open Access Licence
pen Access Licence
The Ecuadorian Journal of Philosophical-Theological Sciences adheres to the Open Access model in which the contents of scientific publications are freely available in full text on the Internet, without temporary embargoes, and whose editorial production costs are not transferred to the authors. This policy aims to break down the economic barriers that generate inequalities both in access to information and in the publication of research results.
How to Cite
References
De Certeau, M. (1993a). La escritura de la Historia. México: Universidad Iberoamericana.
_____________. (1993b). La Fábula Mística, siglos XVI-XVII. México: Universidad
Iberoamericana.
______________. (1995). La toma de la palabra y otros escritos políticos. México:
Universidad Iberoamericana/ ITESO.
______________. (2000) La invención de lo cotidiano. México: Universidad
Iberoamericana/ITESO, volumen I.
______________. (2003). Historia y psicoanálísis, México: Universidad
Iberoamericana/ITESO.
______________. (2021). El extranjero o la unión en la diferencia. España: Editorial Trotta.
Dosse, F. (2003). El caminante herido. México: Universidad Iberoamericana.
Freijomil, A. G. (2020). Arts de braconner. Une histoire matérielle de la lectura chez
Michel de Certeau. Francia: Classiques Garnier.
Girard, F. (1993). El viajero alterado. Historia y Grafía, 1, 61-70.
Haraway, D. (1998). Situated Knowledges: the science question in feminism and the
privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14 (3), 575- 599.
Mendiola, A. (2000). El giro historiográfico. La observación de observaciones del pasado.
Historia y Grafía, 15, 181-208.
____________. (2019). Michel de Certeau. La ficción: escuchar la voz del otro. México:
Ediciones Navarra.
Morales, M. (2021). La herencia escondida: las huelas documentales de Roberto Bellarmino
en la pontificia Universidad Gregoriana. Gregorianum, 102 (3), 596-616.
Vázquez, F. (2021). Cómo hacer cosas con Foucault. España: Dado Ediciones.
